The Colonist
by Michael Schmidt
Of late I’ve grown weary
of the standard Bildungsroman, the often
highly autobiographical, nearly always confessional coming-of-age-style story set
in some quaint, typically southern town, complete with its cast of local
eccentrics, its folksy wisdom, and its often shrink-wrapped epiphanies about innocence,
race, and sex. While the tradition in this country is a rich one and not to be
disparaged (one has only to think of Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, McCullers’ The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter, Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, and Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye), and while my favorite novel in the world,
Proust’s In Search of Lost Time, is
nothing if not a protracted and supremely self-indulgent Bildungsroman, it was nevertheless with reluctance
that I picked up a copy of Michael Schmidt’s novel The Colonist in a second-hand bookstore last winter. Three things had alerted me to a possible difference: the novel's setting (Mexico), its
publisher (The Gay Men’s Press) and the language (original, poetic, adroit). Intrigued, I bought the book for $3.95,
though it took me nearly a year to actually read it. I am happy I did.
Set
in the town of San Jacinto in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, The Colonist tells the story of a sickly
English boy growing up in Mexico (in the de facto absence of his aloof and wealthy
parents) in the nurturing company of the family’s devoted housekeeper, Doña Constanza,
and a handsome local orphan named Chayo, the narrator’s friend, ‘brother,’ and romantic
obsession. Remarkably, there is nothing hackneyed, nothing saccharine, in
Schmidt’s treatment of the fraught and tender affinity between these boys. While
clearly autobiographical, and every bit a story about the painful
disenchantment of youth, The Colonist
offers readers a fresh and moving exploration of the seemingly intractable
divisions of class, race, religion, and sexual orientation, as the narrator is
driven to act with increasing desperation to safeguard his relationship with
Chayo, to fend off time itself in order to keep their little ‘green island’ intact.
Told in retrospect, from the
vantage of an older man now settled in England, the novel is a compelling
portrait of one’s man’s attempt to find completion in the past.
Here,
to conclude, to entice you, is the novel’s very fine first page:
Often even now when I wake up I think I’m
there. I retain the error of a few
moments, half-consciously—seem to smell the conflicting scents and hear the
bristling of tropical foliage, pretend that I am not alone in bed, extend my
hand—into vacancy, and let my eyes fall open on English daylight.
I still keep the habit of sleeping with
the curtains drawn back and the windows thrown wide, even in winter. I explain it as a hunger for fresh
air. But it is more a chronic
expectation, as I lie gazing at the blue or cloudy blank framed by pelmet,
curtains and sill. It’s futile as
the childhood prayers of an atheist, which recur to him instinctively and are
half said before he catches himself out.
Sometimes an inert white moon lies against a daylit sky like a tiny
cloud without a drop of water.
In the disorientation of early morning I
return there—because the events were incomplete. It was a place and time alive as little has been since. I spend hours interrogating it, like an
historian puzzling at a fragmentary chronicle, who takes the problems home
because they will not let him go.
Finally he decides to understand it at all costs, if only to be shut of
them at last; he packs away his books, travels backwards in time, takes boat to
the place where the lost events occurred;-- and there, in a suggestive climate,
among ruins and citrus trees, in the dusty roads, among high white-washed
rooms, in the cafés and bars of the descendants—there in the very face of
change—he creates the matter missing from the text. It is not a form of evidence his professional colleagues
would countenance, but something better, whose truth the pulse acknowledges,
the body understands uncritically, regardless of disciplines of mind. As he approaches, it recedes, drawing
him further on—and into it, so that in the end he finds an absence, or himself,
or perhaps in a rare moment (and only for a moment) the thing he sought. He has discovered that nothing but
detail is ever lost for good. The
forms survive in present forms—flawed, as years pass, the flaws grow deeper. Nothing
changes, each thing becomes in time more itself, defined, uniquely broken.
Peter Adam Nash
No comments:
Post a Comment