The German Lesson by Siegfried Lenz
The joys of doing one’s duty are
so varied…that it always
pays to put them in the proper light.
Under Nazi rule the German
people were nothing if not dutiful. The historical record is clear on that. Thanks
in large part to the work of such groundbreaking scholars as Robert Gellately, Ulrich
Herbert, Christopher Browning, Omer Bartov, Robert Ericksen, and—perhaps most
famously—Daniel Goldhagen, it is now widely accepted (though surely the precise
degrees will always be debated) that, during the war, German citizens were not
only well-informed about the Third Reich’s policies and atrocities (receiving regular
bulletins about them on the radio, in the movie theaters, and even in church,
as well as reading about them in the daily papers), but were willing, often
active participants in the horrors themselves. It is a growing body of evidence
that negates, perhaps once and for all, the standard, oft-made claim that “they
[the German people] were only following orders” or were just “reacting to the
extreme duress of a totalitarian state,” the Nazi reign of terror less the will
and product of good, hard-working people than the sinister machinations of an
aberrational clan of “cold-blooded technocrats dispassionately organizing mass
disappearance on an industrial basis.” Sadly, wholesale German complicity is
closer to the truth.
In the years immediately
following the war, young German writers, especially those like Gunter Grass, Heinrich
Boll, and Alfred Andersch (all of whom had worn Wehrmacht uniforms in their youth)
found themselves “standing on the edge of an abyss.” They had few real choices:
they could confront the Nazi horrors head-on, including their own complicity in
them, or they could avoid the subject altogether, seeking their voice and
vision in the abstract, allegorical, and ideal, groping their way back through
the centuries toward a charmed and mystic past. Then there were the writers,
surely the best of them, who sought to define a vision somewhere in between the
two extremes, a vision of then and there, but with a twist, writers like Grass
with his novel The Tin Drum, Boll
with his novel The Clown, and Andersch
with his novel Efraim’s Book. Instead
of directly confronting the monstrous, arguably ineffable phenomenon of the
Nazi years, especially from that proximity, all three authors chose to approach
it more obliquely (as one might study an eclipse by its projection alone), and therefore,
in that way, ‘By indirections find directions out.’ Of all of the novels of the
post-war years I have read, I can think of none that describes the period, the
culture, and its fateful psychology as successfully—with such clarity, depth, and
integrity—as Siegfried Lenz' extraordinary novel The German Lesson.
Told in retrospect, about
a decade after the war, through the eyes of a juvenile delinquent named Siggi
Jepsen who, as punishment, has been confined to his cell to write an essay for
his German lesson called 'The Joys of Duty' ('die Freuden der Phlicht'), the
story proper unfolds during the war in a remote German town on the North Sea, a
bleak, storm-struck village of windmills, peat bogs, and dykes called Rugbüll
where the narrator's father was "the most northerly police officer in Germany."
Charged by Berlin to stop a local Expressionist painter (his own childhood
friend) from practicing his 'degenerate' art, Siggi's father, Jens Ole Jepsen,
carries out his duty with a doggedness and consistency that proves deeply revealing
in its implications for the people of the modest, taciturn town. Writes
Goldhagen, in his controversial and award-winning study Hitler’s Willing Executioners, “All ‘obedience,’ all ‘crimes of
obedience’ (and this refers only to situations in which coercion is not applied
or threatened), depend upon the existence of a propitious social and political
context in which the actors deem the authority to issue commands legitimate and
the commands themselves not to be a gross transgression of sacred values and
the overarching moral order.” Sure enough, this proves true in the remote
little town of Rugbüll, this simple village drama a brilliant microcosm of the
insidiously destructive power of the Third Reich itself.
While at first resistant
to the idea of writing this obligatory essay, the narrator Siggi Jensen, soon
finds himself enthralled by the normally humdrum subject of duty, inhabiting
the past in all its richness, sorrow, and detail, and filling notebook after
notebook with his descriptions of his intense, if largely refracted experiences
of the war as a child in Rugbüll—of the many eccentric characters in the
village there, of his friendship and complicity with the local artist, Max
Ludwig Nansen, and of his ultimate defiance of his father, the dutiful policeman
and proxy for the State. Told in some of the freshest, most evocative language
I have read in years, I would
be remiss if I didn't offer you a little taste of it, this from the opening of
Chapter 2 called "No Painting Permitted":
In the year '43 (to get going somehow), on a Friday it
was, in April, in the morning, perhaps
around midday, my father, Jens Ole Jepsen, policeman, who manned Rugbüll, the northernmost police station in
Schleswig- Holstein, got himself ready for
a daily trip to Bleeckenwarf, in order to deliver
to the painter Max Ludwig Nansen, who the people round about simply called —'The Painter', an official
order form Berlin by which he was forthwith
forbidden to paint. Unhurriedly my father gathered togetherhis rain-cape, field-glasses, uniform belt and
torch; he busied himself at his desk,
obviously with the intention of delaying his departure, buttoned up and unbuttoned his tunic for the second time,
eyed the miserable spring day and
listened to the wind, while I waited for him, muffled up and motionless. It was not merely wind one
heard; this north-westerly, besieging
the farms, the hedges and rows of trees, tumultuously skirmishing, testing their resistance, was what shaped the
landscape, a black, windy landscape, crooked
and tousled and charged with some incomprehensible
meaning. It was this wind of ours, I think, that made the roofs keen of hearing, made the trees
prophetic, caused the old mill to grow
larger, swept across the ditches so that they became delirious, or attacked the peat-barges, despoiling
their shapeless loads.
When our wind was out and about, one was well advised to
put some ballast in one's
pockets—packets of nails, or bits of lead piping or even a flat-iron—to be a match for it. Such a wind
is part of our lives and we could not
argue with Max Ludwig Nansen for bursting his paint-tubes, taking furious violet and crude white to make
the north-westerly visible, this north-westerly
that belongs to us and which we know so well—the wind to which my father was listening with deep
suspicion.
Siegfried Lenz (1926-2014) is one of Germanys' most signficant post-war
writers whose novels explore individual German culpabilty for the horors of
Nazism. The German Lesson, a New
Directions book, was transalated Ernest Kaiser and Eithne Wilkins.
Peter Adam Nash
No comments:
Post a Comment