“Oysters” by Anton Chekhov
In her excellent biography of the Italian novelist, Elsa Morante, Lily Tuck recounts how the author, in a famous interview with Michel David, expressed her belief that reality was much closer or “truer” in childhood. Adults, by contrast, tended to distance themselves from it through their often mindless devotion to their careers, to their wealth and possessions, to vanity, drink, and sex. The best way to know reality, Morante insisted, was through the eyes of a child.
I think Chekhov might have
agreed—at least in part, for he too felt a great affinity for the way that
children see and suffer the world. In the Modern Library collection Anton Chekhov: Early Short Stories, 1883-1888, there are no less than ten stories
that deal expressly with the experience and perspectives of youth, stories such
as “Children,” “Grisha,” “An Incident,” “The Runaway,” and “Oysters,” the
subject of this post.
Written to help support
himself while in medical school, this lesser known story, “Oysters,” is a perfect
example of what William Trevor—in describing Chekhov’s fiction—called “the art
of the glimpse.” Less the five pages long, and shot through with pathos and
humor, it tells the story of a boy, the narrator, who, while out begging with
his father before an upscale Moscow restaurant, spots a sign for ‘Oysters,’ a
word he has never seen before and about which he questions his father at length:
“Papa,
what does ‘oysters’ mean?” I repeated.
“It
is an animal…that lives in the sea…”
When pressed further his beleaguered
father explains, “They are eaten alive…They are in shells like tortoises,
but…in two halves,” a revelation that leaves the boy aghast:
So
that’s what ‘oysters’ meant! I imagined to myself a creature like a frog. A frog sitting in a shell, peeping out from
it with big, glittering eyes, and moving its revolting jaws. I imagined the
creature in a shell with claws, glittering eyes, and slimy skin…The grown-ups
would take it and eat it, eat it alive with its eyes, its teeth, its legs!
While it squeaked and tried to bite their lips…”
It is a vision that
torments the boy, even in sleep, after some rich men have forced him to sample
some of the creatures and he lies nauseous at home in bed. Chekhov renders this
moment—the boy’s confusion, his sickness, his horror—with startling authenticity
and force. What’s more he does so against the darker, more dreadful background of
the boy’s abject and broken father pacing the room beside him, mumbling madly
to himself.
If you have never read
Chekhov’s short stories you are in for a treat. A brilliant playwright, he was also
a master of the short story, having—in the course of his short career—composed no
less than five hundred of them. Writes Raymond Carver: “Chekhov’s stories are
as wonderful (and necessary) now as when they first appeared. They present, in
an extraordinarily precise manner, an unparalleled account of human activity
and behavior in his time; and so they are valid for all time. Anyone who reads
literature, anyone who believes, as one must, in the transcendent power of art,
sooner or later has to read Chekov.” Indeed his stories—so luminous, so simple—are
sure to sharpen your perception of the world, tightening the ratchet on all you
see and feel.
Anton Pavlovich
Chekhov (1860-1904), who trained and practiced as a doctor, was a major Russian
playwright and master of the modern short story. A literary artist of laconic
precision, he probed below the surface of ordinary Russian life, laying bare
the secret motives of his characters. His stories are distinguished by their
simple plots, their psychological treatment of character, and their complex and
ambiguous endings. (Thanks in part to Britannica.com)
Peter
Adam Nash
No comments:
Post a Comment